Recommandé par l'IIF / Document IIF

Évaluation de différents concepts de centrales électriques à cycle organique de Rankine pour la production de chaleur et d'électricité géothermiques.

Evaluation of different ORC power plant concepts for geothermal heat and power generation.

Numéro : 1135

Auteurs : TOSELLI D., ELLER T., WEITH T., HEBERLE F., BRÜGGEMANN D.

Résumé

In this work, different geothermal heat and power generation concepts are evaluated under techno-economic aspects. The investigated solutions cover different geothermal conditions and ORC power plant technical features available in Germany. The evaluation is based on annual simulations by using Aspen Plus V8.8. For the heat demand, a peak load of 5 MW is assumed. In case of a geothermal well-head temperature of 135 °C, the double-stage ORC shows a second law efficiency of 38.5 %, while the one-stage concept leads to 33.1 %. In general, the analysis shows that the technically more challenging ORC concept leads to a higher amount of produced electrical energy and to a lower levelized cost of electricity (LCOE). For instance, the double-stage ORC provides a higher turbine power output than the one-stage. In addition, an economic analysis shows that the double-stage concept leads to a slightly lower LCOE of 13.79 €ct/kWh compared to the one-stage ORC. The results enable operators and planners to identify the most suitable power plant configuration in dependence of reservoir conditions and specific heating demand.

Documents disponibles

Format PDF

Pages : 7

Disponible

  • Prix public

    20 €

  • Prix membre*

    Gratuit

* meilleur tarif applicable selon le type d'adhésion (voir le détail des avantages des adhésions individuelles et collectives)

Détails

  • Titre original : Evaluation of different ORC power plant concepts for geothermal heat and power generation.
  • Identifiant de la fiche : 30027661
  • Langues : Anglais
  • Source : IIR Rankine Conference 2020.
  • Date d'édition : 31/07/2020
  • DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.18462/iir.rankine.2020.1135

Liens


Voir d'autres communications du même compte rendu (75)
Voir le compte rendu de la conférence