Share

COMPARISON OF AIR AND WATER COOLED RECIPROCATING CHILLER SYSTEMS.

Author(s) : SHAFFER R.

Type of article: Article

Summary

IT IS GENERALLY THOUGHT THAT THE WATER COOLED CHILLER AND TOWER, WITH ITS SLIGHTLY LOWER FIRST COST AND LOWER CONDENSING TEMPERATURE, WILL HAVE A LOWER OWNING COST. HOWEVER, THE POWER TAKEN BY THE CONDENSING WATER PUMP, THE COST OF WATER AND THE HIGHER MAINTENANCE COSTS FOR THE TOWER MAY SHOW THE AIR COOLED UNIT TO BE CHEAPER. A.R.T.

Details

  • Original title: COMPARISON OF AIR AND WATER COOLED RECIPROCATING CHILLER SYSTEMS.
  • Record ID : 1988-0984
  • Languages: English
  • Source: Heat. Pip. Air Cond. - vol. 59 - n. 8
  • Publication date: 1987/08
  • Document available for consultation in the library of the IIR headquarters only.

Links


See other articles in this issue (5)
See the source

Indexing