Gender-specific cold responses induce a similar body-cooling rate but different neuroendocrine and immune response.

Author(s) : SOLIANIK R., SKURVYDAS A., VITKAUSKIENE A., et al.

Type of article: Article

Summary

This study investigated whether there are any gender differences in body-heating strategies during cold stress and whether the immune and neuroendocrine responses to physiological stress differ between men and women. Thirty-two participants (18 men and 14 women) were exposed to acute cold stress by immersion to the manubrium level in 14 °C water. The cold stress continued until rectal temperature (TRE) reached 35.5 °C or for a maximum of 170 min. The responses to cold stress of various indicators of body temperature, insulation, metabolism, shivering, stress, and endocrine and immune function were compared between men and women. During cold stress, TRE and muscle and mean skin temperatures decreased in all subjects (P < 0.001). These variables and the TRE cooling rate did not differ between men and women. The insulative response was greater in women (P < 0.05), whereas metabolic heat production and shivering were greater (P < 0.05) in men. Indicators of cold strain did not differ between men and women, but men exhibited larger changes in the indicators of neuroendocrine (epinephrine level) and in immune (tumor necrosis factor-a level) responses (both P < 0.05). The results of the present study indicated that men exhibited a greater metabolic response and shivering thermogenesis during acute cold stress, whereas women exhibited a greater insulative response. Despite the similar experience of cold strain in men and women, the neuroendocrine and immune responses were larger in men. Contrary to our expectations, the cooling rate was similar in men and women.

Details

  • Original title: Gender-specific cold responses induce a similar body-cooling rate but different neuroendocrine and immune response.
  • Record ID : 30013363
  • Languages: English
  • Source: Cryobiology - vol. 69 - n. 1
  • Publication date: 2014/08
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2014.04.015

Links


See other articles in this issue (1)
See the source